Eleven of fourteen posts made no measurable difference. Put that in the report.
The first internal version of Numal showed only the posts that had matched sales. It looked fantastic. Every report was a list of wins, because the losses had been quietly filtered out.
We showed it to an owner we'd worked with for two years. She read it for about ten seconds and asked how many posts there had been in total. Fourteen. And how many are on this list? Three.
That was the end of that design.
Every Numal report now carries a row that says how many posts returned nothing measurable. Most months it's the majority. For a café posting three times a week, a typical month is eleven or twelve quiet posts and two that moved the POS.
Agencies worry this line will get them fired. In practice it does the opposite, for a reason that's obvious in hindsight: an owner who already suspects most posts do nothing is not surprised by the number. They're surprised that you showed it. And once that line is on the page, the two posts that did work stop reading like marketing and start reading like evidence.
The secondary effect is the useful one. When you can see which two posts out of fourteen moved money, the next month's plan writes itself — and it usually looks less like a content calendar and more like repeating the thing that worked.
Read-only, amounts and times. Not names, not baskets, not cards.
A script for the conversation every agency has been avoiding since the invention of the impressions chart.
Why Numal's attribution window is deliberately, uncomfortably short.
The attribution section of the product page walks through one café's August, quiet posts included.
Numal sets two kinds of cookie and no others. There is no advertising network on this site, so there is nothing here to sell you.
Your choice is stored on this device and applies until you change it. Details are in the Privacy Policy.