A script for the conversation every agency has been avoiding since the invention of the impressions chart.
August was $980 against a $900 retainer. July was $3,410. Nothing changed about how the work was done. The call is tomorrow.
The instinct is to lead with context — the heat, the holidays, the algorithm. Don't. The owner has heard context before and it sounds identical to an excuse, because for most of their previous agencies it was one.
Say the figure first, in one sentence, without cushioning it. “August attributed $980. That's a bad month and I want to talk about why.” You have now said the worst thing in the room, which means nobody else has to, and the rest of the call is about diagnosis instead of extraction.
This is where a Numal report earns its cost. You can show that one post out of fourteen matched, that the one which matched was the same format that carried July, and that the other thirteen were a format you'd been experimenting with. That's not an excuse. That's a finding, and the plan for September follows from it.
The agencies that survive bad months are not the ones that had fewer of them.
Why Numal's attribution window is deliberately, uncomfortably short.
The least popular thing about Numal, and the reason the numbers mean anything.
Eleven of fourteen posts made no measurable difference. Put that in the report.
The attribution section of the product page walks through one café's August, quiet posts included.
Numal sets two kinds of cookie and no others. There is no advertising network on this site, so there is nothing here to sell you.
Your choice is stored on this device and applies until you change it. Details are in the Privacy Policy.